|
Volume
XIV, No. 7
March 6, 2006
|
| TOP
STORY
States in recent years
have tried a number of ways to slow illegal immigration. Now, almost a
dozen are considering economic penalties against employers who hire undocumented
workers, while others want to limit their education opportunities.
|
SNCJ
Spotlight
Frustration spurs
tougher state stance on immigration
The media attention garnered by the rise of the "Minuteman Project"
citizen militias and last summer's declarations of states of emergency
in ARIZONA and NEW MEXICO helped generate a wave of new state laws targeting
illegal immigration last year. Congress' failure to adequately address
the issue thus far in its current session -- or in the two decades since
the last overhaul of U.S. immigration policy, for that matter -- has only
spurred state lawmakers to step up their efforts this year. |
The immigration-related themes featured in 2005 appear to be
getting plenty of play in statehouses again this year. INDIANA, for instance,
is seeking to prohibit illegal immigrants from accessing state social programs.
COLORADO may grant local law enforcement the power to arrest undocumented
residents. And a VIRGINIA lawmaker wants to make his state the third in
the nation to create a special driver's license for non-citizens.
But state lawmakers are also trying some new approaches. In Arizona,
which has been at the forefront of the immigration issue since voters there
barred undocumented immigrants from voting and receiving state social services
in 2004 (with Proposition 200), Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) is backing legislation
that would fine businesses that employ illegal immigrants. And the Grand
Canyon State is not the only one targeting employers of undocumented workers;
according to State Net's database, 10 other states (See Bird's eye view
for listing) have taken up similar proposals this session.
Immigration policy experts say that in the past, efforts to impose employer
sanctions have been opposed by both pro-business Republicans and minority-friendly
Democrats. The fact that such measures are now finding favor among more
mainstream politicians like Napolitano, they say, marks a significant shift
in how states are dealing with the issue (although others have claimed
the Arizona governor's tougher stance on illegal immigration is an election-year
gambit).
Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Center
for Immigration Studies, a think tank that supports tighter immigration
controls, likes the idea of employer sanctions. "This should have been
the point the whole time. Illegal immigrants aren't coming for food stamps.
They're coming for low wages," he said.
States, however, actually have little leeway when it comes to punishing
employers of illegal immigrants, since federal law already explicitly prohibits
the hiring of undocumented workers. In fact, no state has passed an employer-sanction
law since federal immigration rules were changed in 1986, according to
Marielena Hincapie of the National Immigration Law Center, a nonprofit
organization that advocates for low-income immigrants. But Hincapie says,
"The push for employer sanctions is part of a larger frustration at the
local level" over the federal government's continued inaction on illegal
immigration. She says that what states do have the authority to do is increase
the penalties for violating labor laws.
The same frustration that is leading many states to exercise that power
is also impelling several to reconsider their position on another controversial
immigration issue: college tuition assistance. CALIFORNIA passed a law
in 2004 allowing the children of illegal immigrants to attend public colleges
at in-state tuition rates as long as those children graduated from a California
high school. Eight other states -- ILLINOIS, KANSAS, New Mexico, NEW YORK,
OKLAHOMA, TEXAS, UTAH and WASHINGTON -- followed suit.
DiAnna Schimek (D), who chairs the Senate education committee in NEBRASKA,
another state that has considered in-state tuition for illegal immigrants,
recently expressed the sort of thinking that led to those measures. "These
children didn't bring themselves" to this country, she says. "It's only
a good investment on our part to make certain they are productive citizens."
But lawmakers in Kansas, New Mexico and Utah are now trying to repeal
their tuition-benefit laws. And legal challenges to tuition assistance
for illegal immigrants have been initiated in California and Kansas.
University of Missouri law professor Kris Kobach, who brought the Kansas
suit, contends that the Sunflower State's tuition-assistance program violates
a federal law prohibiting states from providing benefits to illegal aliens
that aren't available to U.S. citizens as well. Kansas Rep. Becky Hutchins
(R), one of the leaders of the state's legislative repeal effort, shares
that view. "There's something wrong with giving a benefit to an illegal
that we don't give to citizens of other states," she said.
There are other reasons for the changing fortune of immigrant tuition
assistance. One is that even if illegal immigrants receive the benefit
and manage to defy the odds stacked against graduating, there is almost
no way for them to legally get a job or become a legalized citizen under
current law. Federal legislation to remedy that situation -- a measure
called the Dream Act -- was cosponsored by nearly half of the U.S. Senate
in 2003, but its prospects have since faded.
The main cause for the shift, however, may just be voter backlash against
illegal immigration in general. That notion certainly appears to be on
the mind of Utah Rep. Glenn Donnelson (R), who said that the 400,000 illegal
immigrants now flooding into his state every year is "an alarm to the people
here...it's a drain on the economy." Likewise, New Mexico Sen. Rod Adair
(R), who initiated an unsuccessful effort to repeal his state's tuition
benefit, said he'd merely acted "in response to my constituents. They're
frustrated."
And protesting tuition-assistance programs is one of the only outlets
voters have to vent their frustration. Federal law guarantees illegal immigrants
access to emergency medical services and a 1982 Supreme Court ruling assures
them access to public education through high school.
Congressional lawmakers are working on an overhaul of federal immigration
policy, but pro-business Republicans and Democrats who want new laws that
will allow illegal immigrants to eventually become citizens are at odds
with social conservatives and national-security hawks who prefer
changes that will discourage illegal immigration. That rift stymied efforts
to overhaul immigration policy in the U.S. House last year, and is doing
the same thing in the Senate this year. Which means state lawmakers may
continue to be frustrated about federal inaction on the issue for a while
to come. (STATELINE.ORG, WALL STREET JOURNAL, STATENET.COM)
-- Compiled by KOREY CLARK
TOP
OF PAGE
Bird's
eye view
States
target employers in battle over illegals
States have in recent years become the national battleground over illegal
immigration (See SNCJ Spotlight in this issue). State lawmakers across
the country are considering a number of approaches to this controversial
issue, including ARIZONA's 2004 voter-approved measure barring undocumented
immigrants from voting or receiving government services. And although federal
law already bars hiring undocumented workers, 11 states are now considering
their own sanctions against employers that violate the law, including stiff
fines for those companies that knowingly hiring illegals. The accompanying
map shows the states that are currently mulling those sanctions.
-- Compiled by RICH EHISEN
TOP OF
PAGE
The
Week in Session
States in Regular
Session: AK, AL, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IL, KS, KY,
MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OK, RI, SC, SD, TN, US,
VA, VT, WA, WI, WV
States in Special Session:
AZ "a", CA "a"
States in Budget Hearing
Recess: DE, PA
Special Sessions in Recess:
OK "a", PA "a"
Letters
indicate special/extraordinary sessions
Compiled
By JAMES ROSS| Data current as of 03/03/06 | Source: State
Net database
TOP OF
PAGE
|
Budget & taxes
TABOR DEAD IN KANSAS? House
Speaker Doug Mays (R) said last week that the state's Taxpayer's Bill of
Rights amendment, which he co-sponsored, is basically dead for the 2006
session. Mays said that he isn't "picking up much appetite among House
members, Republican or Democrat" for the measure. Observers say advocates
for higher education, social services and the business community have been
working against the proposal, possibly as a result of COLORADO voters'
decision to suspend their TABOR amendment last November. (LAWRENCE JOURNAL-WORLD)
BUDGETS IN BRIEF: The U.S. Supreme
Court heard arguments last week in a case concerning the constitutionality
of tax breaks that OHIO used in 1998 to convince DaimlerChrysler to expand
an assembly plant in the Buckeye State. If the justices choose to uphold
a lower court ruling, states across the country could face similar challenges
(STATE [COLUMBIA]). * The nonprofit, nonpartisan Tax Foundation released
its third edition of the State Business Tax Climate Index, which ranks
the 50 sates on the basis of how "business friendly" their tax codes are.
WYOMING, SOUTH DAKOTA, ALASKA, FLORIDA and NEVADA top the rankings, while
VERMONT, OHIO, RHODE ISLAND, NEW JERSEY and NEW YORK sit at the bottom
of the list (TAXFOUNDATION.ORG). * The ILLINOIS Department of Transportation
said last week that it wants to spend $10.4 billion over five years to
repair and expand the state's highway system. That plan is separate from
the $2.3 billion Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) has already proposed for highway
construction projects (CHICAGO BUSINESS). * MICHIGAN has caught nearly
9,000 people in its crackdown on smokers who buy their cigarettes on the
Internet to get around the state's $2-per-pack tax. Collectively, the state
has billed the tax dodgers $5.9 million. And with only four of the 13 Internet
sellers the state subpoenaed last year having turned over their customer
lists so far, the number of dodgers -- and dollars -- is likely to rise
considerably (DETROIT FREE PRESS). * SOUTH DAKOTA's ethanol industry pumped
more than $1 billion into the state's economy in 2004, according to a study
conducted by Stuefen Research of Vermillion. In addition to generating
$675.5 million in sales, the industry also provided close to 4,000 jobs
(RAPID CITY JOURNAL).
-- Compiled by KOREY CLARK
TOP OF PAGE
Politics &
leadership
HIGH COURT HEARS HEFTY CASES:
Last week was a big one for the U.S. Supreme Court, which took up a pair
of cases that could significantly alter the way politics is conducted in
America.
On Tuesday, the court heard arguments in the case of Randall v. Sorrell,
concerning the constitutionality of a 1997 VERMONT law (Act 64) that imposed
strict limits on campaign spending. The high court struck down such limits
as a violation of free speech 30 years ago in the landmark case of Buckley
v. Valero, but evidently the justices feel it's time for another look.
And they're not alone. "The time has come for the court to take a second
look," says Brenda Right of the National Voting Rights Institute. "What
we had in Vermont that prompted this law was that there was a moment when
the legislature and the citizenry felt that they were on the brink of slipping
into the kind of special interest money-dominated politics that they saw
at the national level and they did not want to see this happening to their
state."
Ironically, the same case that has been cited as precedent in lower
court rulings rejecting the Vermont law offers some hope for that law's
supporters. While the justices in Buckley v. Valero ruled that the government
could not restrict how much political candidates can spend, they decreed
that it could impose reasonable limits on how much money can be contributed
to political candidates as a means of deterring corruption.
Consequently, Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell planned to argue
that although special-interest influence might not be as much of a problem
in his state as it is in some others or Congress, the First Amendment shouldn't
prevent the state from trying to do something about it. "We've got perhaps
a Vermont-scale problem," he said prior to making his appearance before
the high court, "but we contend we have the right and need to address it."
However, Jim Bopp Jr., an INDIANA attorney who is representing the Vermont
State Republican Committee in opposing the campaign spending law, dismisses
the notion that corruption is a significant problem in the Green Mountain
State. "They're attempting to demonstrate Vermont has the most corrupt
system. This is an absurd proposition," he said, following up with a swipe
at the Garden State: "This sounds more like New Jersey."
Cheryl Hanna, a professor of constitutional law at Vermont Law School,
thinks Bopp's side is more likely to prevail. "If the Supreme Court upholds
Vermont's expenditure provisions, it will indeed be a landmark case," she
said. But she added, "I have a hard time seeing the court move in that
direction."
The day after listening to arguments for and against Vermont's campaign
spending law, the justices took up a series of challenges to TEXAS' controversial
2003 congressional redistricting from Democratic members of Congress and
minority voters. The plaintiffs claim that the map was based on out-of-date
population data which underrepresented Latinos, that it discriminated against
minority voters by alternately splitting them among districts and packing
them together and that it was undertaken solely for political gain.
That last contention has drawn most of the attention from the media,
in large part because the mid-decade redistricting helped to secure Republican
control of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2004 and, consequently,
tends to inflame partisan passions. J. Gerald Hebert, who has unsuccessfully
challenged the map in lower courts, called it "one of the most notorious
power grabs in the history of our country, with the single-minded purpose
of gaining partisan (Republican) advantage."
In a 2004 case in PENNSYLVANIA, however, the high court was unable to
agree on a standard for determining when a redistricting plan is too partisan,
although one justice, Anthony Kennedy, did not rule out the possibility
of doing so in the future. How the changeover of two justices might affect
the court's position on the issue is unclear. But Guy-Uriel E. Charles,
a redistricting expert and visiting professor at Columbia University, thinks
the court is more likely to strike down the Texas map than simply confirm
its Pennsylvania decision. "Otherwise, why take the case?" he said.
Charles believes the case involves several issues, such as mid-decade
redistricting, overt partisanship, and racial discrimination, that could
allow the court to strike down the Texas map without setting standards
for future cases. "The Texas case might present an opportunity to the court
to say, `We're serious about policing the extremes of partisanship,' without
the court having to come up with one standard that applies to all other
cases."
On the other hand, the court's decision -- expected in June -- could
be far-reaching, increasing the frequency of partisan battles over redistricting
in the states or shaking up the political composition of the U.S. House.
Weighty political issues weren't the only thing on the Supreme Court's
docket last week, however. Between the Vermont campaign finance and Texas
remap cases, the justices squeezed in some time to ponder Playboy playmate
Anna Nicole Smith's fight for a share of her late husband's more than $1
billion estate. (CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, BURLINGTON FREE PRESS, AUSTIN
AMERICAN-STATESMAN, HOUSTON CHRONICLE, RUTLAND HERALD)
CORRECTION: In the Feb 20 issue
of the State Net Capitol Journal, we mistakenly identified Rep. Perry Clark
(D) as the winner of a special election for the 37th District Senate seat
in Jefferson County, VIRGINIA. The Mr. Clark and Jefferson County we were
referencing actually both reside in KENTUCKY, not Virginia. We regret the
error.
POLITICS IN BRIEF: Early voting
came to ILLINOIS last Monday, with numerous polling places opening for
the Prairie State's March 21 primary. Illinois joins more than 30 states
that already offer early voting in the hope of increasing voter turnout
(CHICAGO SUN-TIMES, CHICAGO TRIBUNE). * More than 100 churches in MARYLAND
have donated money to political candidates since 2000 in violation of federal
tax law, according to a review of candidate finance reports by the Baltimore
Sun. Churches that the IRS determines have made political contributions
could face a 10 percent excise tax on the donations or revocation of their
tax-exempt status (BALTIMORE SUN). * The state of NEW YORK has entered
into negotiations with the federal government in an effort to avoid a lawsuit
for failing to modernize its voting system in compliance with the Help
America Vote Act. The approach currently being discussed would leave the
current system in place for the election this fall -- when Empire State
voters will, among other things, choose a U.S. senator, a governor and
all 212 members of the state legislature -- but improve access to the polls
for disabled voters (NEW YORK TIMES).
-- Compiled by KOREY CLARK
TOP OF PAGE
Governors
GOVS SOUND OFF AT BUSH: Governors
from across the nation got a chance to voice their concerns directly to
President George W. Bush during the annual National Governors Association
(NGA) meeting in Washington D.C. last week. Although ongoing immigration
concerns and rising health care and prescription medication costs were,
as always, focal points in that discussion, the dominant issue for many
governors was an impending Pentagon-led reconfiguration of the National
Guard.
The Guard has a dual federal-state role, with governors normally commanding
its usage in their states, while members deployed overseas on a federal
mission are under the control of the president. Military officials generally
revamp the Guard every four years, with the latest proposal recommending
a reduction in the number of National Guard combat-trained brigades from
34 to 28, with the balance being reassigned to support duties.
But many governors feel the Bush administration has already significantly
weakened the Guard by stripping it of equipment and personnel needed to
respond to hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, forest fires, terrorist attacks
and other state emergencies. John Goheen, spokesman for the National Guard
Association, a nonpartisan advocacy group for guardsmen, said governors
are concerned over how further reductions might affect states' ability
to respond to Katrina-like disasters. "They know they would lose a lot
of capability if they go from a 3,500-member combat brigade to a 200-member
support brigade," Goheen said.
LOUISIANA Gov. Kathleen Blanco (D) expressed perhaps the gravest reservations
about the reconfiguration. "We should be increasing the number of National
Guard combat brigades, not reducing it," Blanco said prior to the meetings
with Bush and other administration officials.
Governors also complained that millions of dollars in National Guard
equipment -- from trucks to satellite phones -- has been left behind by
troops when they returned home from duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving
states perilously short on needed equipment in the case of a catastrophic
event.
But Governors Haley Barbour (R) of MISSISSIPPI and John Hoeven (R) of
NORTH DAKOTA sounded more optimistic after meeting with Bush, Secretary
of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff. After those meetings, Barbour and Hoeven seemed satisfied that
the administration will both reimburse states for the lost equipment and
provide adequate funding to maintain total Guard membership at 350,000
for the foreseeable future.
ARKANSAS Gov. Mike Huckabee (R), the current NGA chairman, said Rumsfeld
acknowledged that the administration should have done a better job of consulting
with governors before issuing the budget and restructuring plans. "The
main thing that's different as of today is that they realize that we have
to be a partner in the discussion, that we could help them sell a program
or we could be a force to reckon with to keep it from ever happening."
The 18-member Western Governors Association (WGA) also used the NGA
meeting to issue a resolution calling on Congress to pass comprehensive
immigration reform. The resolution called for, among other things, an expanded
guest worker program, stricter enforcement of laws barring employers from
hiring undocumented workers (see SNCJ Spotlight in this issue) and building
regional federal prisons to house illegal immigrants who commit crimes.
States currently pay much of the cost of jailing criminal aliens. Congress
is scheduled to begin review this week of similar legislation introduced
by PENNSYLVANIA Sen. Arlen Specter (R).
CALIFORNIA Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) was one of many western governors
to voice support for changing the current system. "Ideally we have a perfect
situation where you have people that want to work and you have companies
that need workers, so you have supply and demand, but how do you make that
work is really the big challenge," Schwarzenegger said.
"When you think about issues that impact the West, this immigration
issue is really the top issue right now," said ARIZONA Gov. Janet Napolitano,
(D), who chairs the WGA. "We believe that some of the rhetoric coming out
of our nation's capitol vis a vis illegal immigration is unfounded and
unwise, and what we really need is a very comprehensive approach to this
issue," she said. (NEW YORK TIMES, SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE, WASHINGTON
POST, STATELINE.ORG)
MANCHIN SLOWS MINE RESCUE GEAR TIMETABLE: WEST
VIRGINIA Gov. Joe Manchin (D) said last week he will give coal operators
more time to install new mine rescue gear, instead appointing a six-person
task force to review the "commercial availability and functional and operational
capability" of the equipment. The governor originally ordered coal operators
to have the equipment in place by this week.
A Manchin spokesperson said that the new task force was aimed at addressing
coal industry concerns that the necessary communications and tracking devices
may not work at all locations in all underground mines. Some coal operators
had complained that Manchin's original timetable was too aggressive and
did not allow them enough time to adequately evaluate the available technology.
In addition to delaying the deadline and creating the task force, Manchin
also ordered that state mines be equipped with rescue chambers to provide
miners with more emergency oxygen, with each rescue chamber to include
a 24-hour air supply, compared to the 16 hours of breathing devices Manchin
had earlier required in a cache at the working face of each state mine.
The new rules are a direct response to the deaths of 16 Mountain State
miners in multiple accidents over a three-week period in January and February.
(CHARLESTON GAZETTE)
FLETCHER GOES HOME, PATAKI STAYS PUT: KENTUCKY
Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R) was released from the hospital last week after
undergoing surgery to remove his badly-diseased gall bladder. Fletcher
was initially admitted on Feb. 12 after suffering from severe abdominal
pain. He was diagnosed with a gallstone in his bile duct, but during the
treatment was found to also have gall bladder disease. It only got worse
from there, as he also contracted pancreatitis and a potentially life-threatening
bloodstream infection during his two-week stay. Fletcher's condition improved
enough last week to allow him to go home, although he is still weak and
is required to take intravenous antibiotics. First Lady Glenna Fletcher,
a registered nurse, will administer the IVs.
NEW YORK Gov. George Pataki (R), however, had to stay hospitalized after
also contracting an infection during his surgery for a ruptured appendix
on Feb. 16. Pataki also underwent another surgery for an intestinal blockage.
The governor's doctors said normal recovery time for a burst appendix is
from one to three weeks, but refused to speculate as to when he will actually
be able to leave the hospital. Both Fletcher and Pataki have spent their
down time conducting state business from their hospital rooms, with Pataki
Chief of Staff John Cahill saying he was forced to take the governor's
Blackberry away from him so he would rest. (TIMES-UNION [ALBANY], LEXINGTON
HERALD-LEADER)
GOVERNORS IN BRIEF: Delegates at
the CALIFORNIA Republican Party convention in San Jose last week rejected
a proposed resolution to pull the state GOP's endorsement of Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger (R) in the upcoming gubernatorial election. Some conservative
activists are unhappy that Schwarzenegger hired a Democrat as his chief
of staff, supports Democrat-led efforts to raise the minimum wage, and
wants the state to borrow $68 billion as part of a $222 billion plan to
improve the state's levees, schools and roads (SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS).
* Citing the need to help police along the Mexican-American border battle
smuggling, drug cartels and kidnapping plots, TEXAS Gov. Rick Perry (R)
called for law enforcement to have greater wiretapping authority within
the state. Perry said he wants to expand that authority, which is currently
limited to murder and drug trafficking investigations, to also include
kidnapping, aggravated assault and extortion (DALLAS MORNING NEWS). * A
MAINE lawmaker has scaled back his efforts to increase the governor's salary.
State Sen. Gary Moore (R) originally proposed hiking the pay scale from
its current $70,000 -- the lowest in the nation -- to $220,000 annually.
That eventually was trimmed to $150,000, then to its current proposed $102,000.
If passed, it would not take effect until 2011. Current Gov. John Baldacci
(D) has promised to veto the measure if it makes it to his desk. At least
300 people in Pine Tree State government earn more than Baldacci, who brings
in about $27,000 less than the typical city or town manager of a community
with more than 20,000 residents (PORTLAND PRESS-HERALD).
-- Compiled by RICH EHISEN
TOP
OF PAGE
|
Here are some of the topics you
will see covered in upcoming issues of the State Net Capitol Journal:
- Raising the minimum wage
- Health care workers: The
right to say no?
- Public pensions
- Abortion
|
Hot issues
BUSINESS: A NEW YORK appeals
court rules that illegal immigrants can sue for lost wages if they are
injured on the job. The decision upholds a state Supreme Court ruling that
said federal immigration laws do not bar such lawsuits (POST-STANDARD [ALBANY]).
* The FLORIDA House shoots down legislation that would have forced Sunshine
State employers to allow workers to keep firearms in their vehicle while
at work (ST. PETERSBURG TIMES). * The Hoosier State House rejects a measure
that would have made INDIANA a right-to-work state. Right-to-work laws
prohibit employees from being required to join a union (FORT WAYNE JOURNAL
GAZETTE). * Still in INDIANA, the Senate approves HB 1010, which would
bar local governments from taking private property under eminent domain
if the seizure is solely for the purpose of increasing that tax base through
economic development. The measure moves to Gov. Mitch Daniels (R), who
is expected to sign it (FORT WAYNE JOURNAL GAZETTE).
CRIME & PUNISHMENT: The KENTUCKY
House endorses HB 236, which would allow Bluegrass State residents to use
deadly force against someone breaking into their home or vehicle. The measure
would also protect homeowners from prosecution and lawsuits related to
shooting. It fires off to the Senate (LEXINGTON HERALD-LEADER). * WISCONSIN
Gov. Jim Doyle (D) signs SB 525, which requires protesters at funerals
to stay at least 500 feet away from a funeral one hour before or after
the service. First-time violators face up to $10,000 in fines and nine
months in jail. A second offense could bring up to a 3-year jail term (JANESVILLE
GAZETTE). * Funeral protests are also on the agenda in INDIANA, where Gov.
Mitch Daniels (R) says he will sign SB 5, legislation that would make it
a felony to commit disorderly conduct within 500 feet of a funeral (FORT
WAYNE JOURNAL GAZETTE). * The GEORGIA Senate unanimously approves SB 522,
which would mandate that children under the age of 13 who commit murder
stay incarcerated until they turn 21. The bill moves to the House (ATLANTA
JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION).
EDUCATION: The KANSAS Senate approves
legislation that requires Sunflower State school districts to provide sex
education classes emphasizing abstinence and teaching about sexually-transmitted
diseases. The measure moves to the House (LAWRENCE JOURNAL-WORLD). * The
UTAH House rejects a measure that would have required teachers to issue
a disclaimer to their students saying that not all scientists agree about
evolution and the origin of species (NEW YORK TIMES). * The VIRGINIA House
okay's HB 1308, which would allow Old Dominion State school boards to ban
any school club "that encourages or promotes sexual activity by unmarried
minor students." It now meets up in the Senate (VIRGINIAN-PILOT [NORFOLK]).
* GEORGIA also addresses high school clubs as the Senate passes SB 413,
which mandates that parents give their approval before their children are
allowed to join an extra curricular club. It moves to the House (ATLANTA
JOURNAL- CONSTITUTION). * A MICHIGAN House committee endorses legislation
that would require Wolverine State students to take an online course to
graduate. It moves to the full House (DETROIT NEWS).
ENVIRONMENT: The OREGON Supreme
Court upholds a Beaver State law that says local governments must allow
land owners to exercise development rights that existed before the state's
land-use restrictions were implemented or compensate the owners for the
lost value caused by those limits. Environmental groups have vowed to pursue
a ballot measure seeking to overturn the law. At least three other states
-- WASHINGTON, OREGON and OKLAHOMA -- are considering similar statutes
(LOS ANGELES TIMES). * The MICHIGAN Senate and House each approve a measure
that would ban the importation of foreign trash. The bill moves to Gov.
Jennifer Granholm (D), who is expected to sign it. The federal government
must also approve it because of a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that
says states cannot prohibit trash from crossing their borders without approval
from Congress (DETROIT NEWS).
HEALTH & SCIENCE: A MARYLAND
House committee snuffs out a measure that would have banned smoking in
Old Line State bars and restaurants. Opponents said such a ban would harm
those businesses (GAZETTE [GAITHERSBURG]). * The VIRGINIA House follows
suit, unanimously rejecting a similar ban on smoking in public places.
The Senate had recently approved the bill (WASHINGTON POST). * The UTAH
House endorses SB 319, which would ban smoking in bars and private clubs.
It returns to the Senate (SALT LAKE TRIBUNE). * The COLORADO Senate endorses
legislation that bars smoking in most public buildings. The measure would
exempt bars that get less than 25 percent of their profits from food. It
wafts over to the House (DENVER POST). * Still in COLORADO, the House okay's
HB 1212, which would allow -- but not require -- Centennial State pharmacists
to dispense the "morning after pill." The measure moves to the Senate (DENVER
POST). * The WASHINGTON House endorses HB 2292, which, among other things,
allows Evergreen State doctors to apologize to malpractice victims without
fear the apology would be used in litigation against them. It moves to
Gov. Christine Gregoire (D) (OLYMPIAN).
HOMELAND SECURITY: TENNESSE officials
temporarily suspend the state "driving certificate" program, which allows
undocumented immigrants to legally drive in the Volunteer State. The suspension
came after an FBI investigation revealed a bribery and fraud ring that
resulted in hundreds of people receiving fraudulent cards (TENNESSEAN [NASHVILLE]).
* A COLORADO Senate committee endorses SB 90, which requires local police
to report suspected illegal immigrants to federal authorities. The committee
rejected seven other measure aimed at addressing illegal immigration (DENVER
POST).
SOCIAL POLICY: The SOUTH DAKOTA
House approves legislation that would ban all abortions except those necessary
to save the mother's life. The measure would not exempt cases of rape or
incest. It moves to Gov. Mike Rounds (R), who is expected to sign it into
law (BELLEVILLE NEWS-DEMOCRAT). * A MISSISSIPPI House committee also endorses
legislation that would allow abortions only if the mother's life is in
danger. It moves to the full House (COMMERCIAL APPEAL[MEMPHIS]). * The
COLORADO Senate kills SB 167, which would have forced employers to give
nursing mothers two 10-minute breaks to pump breast milk (ROCKY MOUNTAIN
NEWS [DENVER]). * The KENTUCKY Senate endorses SB 125, which would require
that women seeking abortions be told in person of medical risks and alternatives
at least 24 hours before the procedure. It moves to the House (COURIER-JOURNAL
[LOUISVILLE]). * The WISCONSIN Assembly approves a constitutional amendment
that would ban same-sex marriage and civil unions in the Badger State.
Voters must also approve the measure in November for it to go into effect
(JANESVILLE GAZETTE).
POTPOURRI: The KENTUCKY Senate approves
HB 277, a bill that would allow schools and local governments to post the
Ten Commandments as part of historical displays. It moves to the House
(LEXINGTON HERALD LEADER). * The IDAHO Senate rejects a proposed constitutional
amendment that would have given residents the constitutional right to hunt,
fish and trap state wildlife (TIMES-NEWS [TWIN FALLS]).
-- Compiled by RICH EHISEN
TOP OF PAGE
UPCOMING ELECTIONS
(03/02/2006
- 03/23/2006):
03/07/2006
Texas Primary Election
House
(All)
Senate
(All)
03/14/2006 Michigan
Special Election
Senate
023
03/14/2006 Pennsylvania
Special Election
House
174
03/21/2006 Alabama
Special Election
House
001
03/21/2006 Illinois
Primary Election
Senate
3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30,
33,36,
39, 42, 45, 48, 51, 54, 57
Constitutional Officers:
Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Treasurer,
Attorney General, Comptroller
US House
(All)
TOP
OF PAGE
|
Once
around the statehouse lightly
"MAKE NICE" POLICE: Republicans
in the WASHINGTON Legislature are smoldering over what they claim is censorship
on the part of majority Democrats. According to the Associated Press, the
House clerk has been removing certain words from GOP postings on the House
Web site -- such as "tax-and-spend liberals" or "lack of honesty with taxpayers."
The chief clerk, Rich Nafziger, defends his actions by saying that taxpayers,
who pay for the Web site, shouldn't subsidize mud slinging. He adds that
the rules allowing his office to make the changes were instituted in the
mid-1990s -- when Republicans controlled the House.
NOT SO PEACHY: War is brewing along
the ALABAMA-GEORGIA border these days, thanks to a resolution passed last
week by the `Bama Legislature. The House designated the peach as the official
state fruit of Alabama, reports the Christian Science Monitor, replacing
the blackberry. Now, that didn't sit well to the east, in the place known
as "The Peach State," where a giant peach drops from a tower on New Year's
Eve, where the main drag in the capital city is known as "Peachtree Street,"
where the casual observer can't meander down a country lane without noticing
the peach orchards and whose most notable athlete was known as "The Georgia
Peach." Ty Cobb aside, an Alabama legislator notes, Chilton County peaches
(from Alabama) have brighter "cheeks" and a sharper taste. No end in sight
to this dispute, although Alabamans have a strong motive for wanting also
to be known as "The Peach State." Currently, Alabama is "The Yellowhammer
State." Doesn't exactly drip from the tongue, does it?
NO GOOD DEED DEPT: She was just
trying to help, and the gesture got an Amtrak conductor fired, reports
the San Francisco Chronicle. Seems that Rebecca Gettleman was working the
Capitol Corridor train in northern CALIFORNIA when she noticed that a passenger
was acting as though he'd had one -- okay, a dozen -- too many. As the
train approached Emeryville near Berkeley, police were notified. The passenger
still had to de-train, and that's where Gettleman's trouble began. The
passenger didn't act up, merely fell -- down a flight of stairs. Gettleman,
with the help of another passenger, prevented the stoner from breaking
his neck, but in so doing, the conductor wrenched her arm and shoulder.
She reported her injuries, as required by law, and that got her sent to
a doctor, as required by law, and that got her a month of physical therapy,
as required by the doctor -- and that got her fired. According to Amtrak,
she had allowed herself to get hurt helping a passenger which, coupled
with a history of work-related injuries, made her accident prone. An appeal
is pending. Common sense, it seems, is on holiday at Amtrak.
HONEST, BUT DUMB: A few years back,
a CALIFORNIA state senator stunned a committee hearing by telling audiences
and colleagues alike that a particular witness wasn't among those who "paid
to play," and so didn't deserve to have her opinions taken seriously on
a particular bill. It was a dead-on assessment even though most legislators
would prefer not to air it in public. Now comes Sen. Deanna Hanna, a COLORADO
Democrat, who last week had to apologize to her colleagues for demanding
$1,400 in "reparations" from a trade association that had endorsed her
Republican opponent two years ago. As the Rocky Mountain News reports,
she asked for $1,400 because that was the amount given to her foe, and
it was Hanna herself who characterized the payment as "reparations" in
a letter to the association -- when it only ponied up $400. Republicans
have called for her resignation. Hanna characterized her demand as a "grave
misjudgment."
-- By A.G. BLOCK
TOP OF PAGE
In
The Hopper
State Net tracks
tens of thousands of bills in all 50 states and Congress at any given time.
Here's a snapshot of what's in the legislative works:
Number of 2006 prefiles
last week: 612
Number of 2006 Intros
last week: 4,886
Number of bills enacted/adopted
last week: 814
Number of 2006 prefiles
to date: 13,813
Number of 2006 Intros
to date: 62,029
Number of enacted/adopted
overall in 2006: 5,342
Compiled
By JAMES ROSS | Data current as of 03/02/06 | Source: State Net database
TOP OF
PAGE
|
In case you missed
it:
A series of caustic
anti-gay protests by a KANSAS church congregation at the funerals for U.S.
war casualties has spurred more than a dozen states to introduce legislation
this year seeking to greatly limit such demonstrations.
But while most observers
are appalled at the vitriolic nature of the protests, others worry that
in the zeal to stop them, lawmakers may be trampling everyone's First Amendment
rights.
In case you missed it, the
article can
be found in the archives
section of our Web site at http://statenet.com/capitol_journal/02-13-2006.
TOP OF
PAGE
|
Editor: Rich
Ehisen
Associate Editor: Korey
Clark
Contributing Editor: A.G.
Block
Editorial Advisor: Lou Cannon
Correspondents: Richard Cox (CA),
Steve Karas (CA),
Bruce McKeeman (CA), Linda Mendenhall (IL),
Lauren King (MA) and Ben Livingood (PA)
Design: Richard Hansen, Heather
Conway
Copyright 2005 State Net
ISSN: 1521-8449
|
|